"The Month I Hated Sub Pop"
Thoughts On Limited Edition Vinyl
About a month ago I went over to the Sub Pop website and
clicked on the information page for the new Beach House album, Bloom. Like most record labels, Sub Pop was
offering a few extras for fans that order early. Among them were a signed poster for the first hundred and
fifty pre-orders and a limited white vinyl on a “first come, first served
basis”. I kicked myself for not
finding this link earlier because the offer for the signed poster was crossed
off. Damn those first hundred and
fifty people who got there quicker than I did. Luckily, the limited (or “Loser Version” as Sub Pop calls
it) white vinyl option was still available, so I ordered Bloom and went about
my life.
A week before the actual release for Bloom, I was hanging
out with my brother (another vinyl obsessed person) and I mentioned that he
should order the limited version of Bloom. We headed over to Sub Pop and saw that the Loser Version was
no longer available as the test had been crossed off like the poster. A heated argument ensued where I should
have sent him the pre-order link the day I ordered it…it’s vinyl code…and I
failed. I felt bad about this, and
offered him my version by default of not alerting my vinyl brethren to a
limited piece of wax we both wanted.
Cut to release week.
Usually pre-orders show up a few days before the release date as a
special treat, but no packages came to the door. As we do most Tuesdays, my brother and I hit all the local
record stores and to our surprise, a single store had FIVE copies of Bloom…the
LOSER VERSION! I was saved from
breaking the vinyl code and my brother had his copy. I purchased another for a friend who had asked me to pick up
a copy for him (little did he know he would get a Loser Version) and left the
other three limited wax, knowing that Beach House fans who failed to pre-order
would be giddy to find these waiting for them.
A week goes by.
Nothing. Finally, two weeks
after the release date, that wonderful feeling hit – a vinyl package was
waiting outside my door. I took
out my knife and carefully opened the parcel, excited to finally put Bloom (an album I love by the way) on the turntable. As the tabs open, I pull out the record and my heart drops. It’s the standard version. After a brief period of pacing around
the house and cursing my luck that the label had messed up the order, I calmly
e-mailed the Sub Pop ordering support team and outlined my problem. The next day I received a less than
satisfactory reply, outlining that they had more multiple pre-orders than
expected (meaning a single order could do Bloom – Loser Version x10) and they
got priority on their stated “first come first serve” policy. No refund was offered, even though what
I ordered is not what I received and all that I received was a promise that my
future order (Beachwood Sparks) would be the correct version I
pre-ordered. That’s it. My response to Sub Pop has already been
taken, so here it is in video form:
So…we should all boycott Sub Pop, right?!
No. That’s not
what I’m asking, and even though there is a lot of text to the story above,
that’s not even what this post is about.
This post is a message to all the indie music labels that sell limited
edition versions of their albums.
It should be a simple process, but it isn’t, and I would like to offer a
few changes that I think would help ensure things like this
don’t happen to any other collector.
While this may seem like a small issue, consider the following. Vinyl is on the rise. Young music fans are making the switch
to buying physical music every day.
Imagine you’re one of these young potential converts, and that you’re
testing the waters with your first vinyl.
Something like this happens.
Are you going to stick with the vinyl scene, or are you going to head
straight back to the torrent sites?
The biggest problem with limited-edition vinyl is flipping. We see this magnified
every Record Store Day, where people who couldn’t care less about vinyl buy
sought after limited releases and then resell them on eBay for four to ten
times as much as the listed price.
This is legal and going after them isn’t the answer. The answer is to stop fueling the fire. Sub Pop and other sites that sell
limited edition vinyl should implement a single purchase per account/credit
card for all of their limited releases.
This was the major problem with my story as people had ordered multiple
pre-order copies. If you don’t
think this is a problem, click this link.
Make an individual button for each version you offer. This is an extremely simple thing that
many record labels, such as Polyvinyl, are already doing to ensure everyone
receives exactly what they order.
Sub Pop and other sites that use a text-based announcement that the
first X amount of orders get a limited edition record are only doing it to
drive up sales and manipulate the customer. If they don’t cross out this text after the supply has been
purchased, they are basically banking on people hoping they ordered in
time. It makes purchasing a sought-after
record a crapshoot, and it’s unfair.
Sub Pop said the Loser Version was based on a “first come
first served basis” and this held true as the people who pre-ordered before me
received the limited version, while I was stuck with the standard wax. But…what about the stores? I was before them on the pecking order
and in a small record store in Louisville they had five of the presumed 1,000
copies. Think about that. If we multiply that out knowing that
bigger stores in Los Angeles/New York had bigger orders, a low guess would put
two hundred copies or so that went out to stores.
Why is this important?
Record labels should list, along with any other exceptions, when copies
of the limited wax will be available in short order at your local record
stores. I hate buying records
online, and anytime I can, I’ll buy from local record stores because they are
hurting and need the support from loyal vinyl fans. But there are times where vinyl labels force my hand because
they offer limited edition versions that can’t be found at the local record store. In my story above, I intentionally failed
to buy the Loser edition locally when I had the chance, and still didn’t
receive the limited wax. I lost
out, and so did my local record store.
It’s simple.
1.)
Make a button that is no longer active when the purchases
reach the number of limited vinyl pressed.
2.)
Limit the purchases of special edition wax to one per
customer.
3.)
Outline everything and be honest. Tell us if the limited wax will be at the local record
store, or if you will repress more of the same limited color, or if there are
any other pressing plans currently, etc.
We’re your loyal customers, and you need us, so be straight with
us. Don’t hide anything from us. When you do, it feels like you’re
trying to cheat the customer (because that’s often exactly what you’re doing).
It’s so simple, it shouldn’t even take this amount of
writing to correct. The story
above should have never happened.
Limited edition releases are fun ways for labels to give vinyl-obsessed
fans a little extra treat if they happen to invest early. Some labels have taken that fun and
manipulated the customer into playing a guessing game, all so they can make a
little more money. The Sub Pop
story above hurt the local record store, could have potentially soured me from
buying physical music (will never happen, but with other, newer listeners, I’m
sure it could), and made the “independent” label look like a corporate fat cat
that went out of their way to over-complicate an easy ordering system so that
people would order direct even after the incentive for doing so was gone.
I own thirty-seven pieces of wax from Sub Pop and will
continue to buy from them and other great labels. However, I will never pick up my standard version of Bloom
without being reminded of this ugly experience. Maybe if they address the three points listed above, that
will change. Maybe I’ll be able to
pick up Bloom and see it as the piece of wax that lead Sub Pop and other vinyl
labels to stop manipulating their customers and to start treating them with the
full respect they deserve. I hope that’s what happens, because limited releases are some of the special joys of collecting music, and are worth getting right. But based off of my experience with Bloom, I’m worried that the vinyl lovers of the future will be forced to temper their expectations.
Preach.
ReplyDeletethe plural of vinyl is actually vinyl
ReplyDeletegood post
ReplyDeleteI played the same vinyl guessing game with Beach House's release day event at my record store. My record store was given about 5 limited edition glow-in-the-dark pressings of 'Bloom' and I was essentially supposed to just get lucky that the copy I picked was special and not standard. It wasn't.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this post so much you can have my limited edition Bloom. Not really, but great work!
ReplyDeleteI've had trouble with Sub Pop's online ordering system in the past as well, most recently when I bought Father John Misty's inaugural offering. Aside from the dreaded "What the shit is this, I thought I snagged the pink vinyl?!" reaction, it took 21 days after my order for them to even ship it when their FAQ promises no more than five.
ReplyDeleteI'm not a new vinyl buyer but I'm very choosy about it, considering my limited budget. In the future, I'll have to really want an album to venture to Sub Pop. Granted, that will certainly happen, but still...
I pre-ordered when the poster was still available and received only the standard version. Glad someone is saying something.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you made this about what needs to change and not just complaining. Had me worried there for half the post.
ReplyDeleteI like it when labels have a subscription service in the form of a record club type of thing like Graveface Records does. Record Club members get exclusive colored vinyl that is hand numbered, that way in being a member you are guaranteed the most limited version of that particular album. Sub Pop should make a "Losers Club" and do the same. All in all though I really enjoyed your post. I think twice every time I see Sub Pop vinyl in shops because I know there is a different version available most of the time. As much as I love my local shops, in in a small town and we rarely get the colored & limited stuff.
ReplyDeleteFirst world problems, anyone?
ReplyDelete... I'm sorry, I can somewhat understand you. But while this is an inconvenience (and you should definitely give Sub Pop some angry calls), isn't this a little over the top?
Definitely first world problems. You didn't pay anything extra for it, it's a lottery.
ReplyDeleteDid you complain when you didn't get the blue sippy cup as a kid too?
They don't care about the customer or listeners. Of course it is easier to send a few people 10 records than many people 1 record. This is lazy and wrong. I would be fuming.
ReplyDelete